Missing from all 4 pages the AI reads
The answers were built from sources such as timeout.com, eater.com and theinfatuation.com. None of them is yours, and none of them lists you.
Example · free scan · 20 August 2026
Brooklyn, New York
The interval is wide, so treat the exact percentage as directional.
You appear, but you are not yet a default recommendation.
Named but not recommended in 22% of answers — the AI knows you, but does not put you forward.
9 of 9 answers100% coverage3 runs per questionChatGPTAug 20, 2026Complete
Each one was put to the AI several times, worded the way a buyer would ask it. Every square is one answer.
recommended you did not
The same questions, asked of each recommendation engine.
How often each brand came up when your buyers' questions were asked. Your row is how often you were recommended.
Names are read from the answers as written. They are observations, not verified companies.
Pages the engines read while answering. Getting listed on these is the most direct way to change the result.
Read from this scan's own evidence — the sources it cited, the brands it named, and the questions you lost.
The answers were built from sources such as timeout.com, eater.com and theinfatuation.com. None of them is yours, and none of them lists you.
It appears in 78% of answers against your 22% — a 56 point gap.
You are never suggested for: "Where in Brooklyn can I find a quiet coffee shop that serves a proper breakfast?"
22% of answers mention it without suggesting it as an option to consider.
Same number, same interval, same rivals and the same raw answers — measured against your business instead of an invented coffee shop.
Measure my brandEvery answer the scan collected, exactly as it came back.